Main | October 2005 »

September 2005 Archives

September 24, 2005

Mixed Messages from the same Institution

It’s a delicate balance to try to maintain.

Almost paradoxical.

Seemingly impossible.

National corporations, in their endless attempts to sell us things, almost always try to appeal to our feelings of individuality, reminding us constantly how their products will make us unique, different, one of a kind.

Everyday, we’re bombarded by messages, encouraging us (with the help of specific products) to go our own way, blaze a new trail, stand out from the crowd.

And yet, at the same time, everyone working inside these companies is reminded on a daily basis to work as a team, a finely-tuned machine, with cooperation and collective effort rising up as the group’s powerful rallying cry.

So, how do we balance the two?

How do we reconcile these bipolar ideologies, which are provided to us by the very same companies?

As an individual walking down the street, with little or no knowledge of the widespread interconnected network of incorporated institutions, the world seems unimaginably chaotic, functioning miraculously on mere coincidence, with each person’s survival and success dependent solely on their intelligence, hard work and ingenuity.

But once inside the corporate structure, the benefits of cooperation are seen almost immediately.

Lawyers, tax attorneys, accountants, marketers, software developers, advertising agencies, public relations firms—everyone working tirelessly under the same protective umbrella, like bees inside the infrastructure of a highly organized honeycomb, with honey production for the entire colony up 3% from last quarter, and 8% from the year before.

In daily memos and weekly meetings and company retreats, the message is always the same.

T.E.A.M.

Together Everyone Achieves More.

And it’s true.

We can see that in the stock reports and the Christmas bonuses and the company-paid vacations.

When people work together towards a common goal, more often than not, everyone within that group does, in fact, achieve more.

Yet many of us, the moment we step beyond the threshold of those sparklingly clean sliding glass company doors, rip off our suits, get in our cars and try to race home like individual superheroes, inevitably getting stuck in traffic in the process, sitting miserably in a four door, four passenger car, all alone, wondering why the commute gets worse and worse every single year.

And eventually, when we do make it home, into our suburban neighborhoods, (those vast havens of anonymity where people smile and wave politely, but no one really knows each other) we shake our heads at the road construction or the latest development in progress—a team of bulldozers razing a field where flowers used to grow and kids used to play.

And for some reason (perhaps because the radio is on, distracting us with commercial messages, reminding us to be an exceptional individual with this product or that one) we feel completely helpless, and without any say as to the decisions being made in our towns and cities, forgetting, it seems, about all those other teams out there, working tirelessly to raise the production of honey in their own honey pots; separate colonies of bees, specializing in finding different sources of pollen, all of them buzzing in unison—land developers scouting out locations, PR firms paving the way with special events and public relations, legal teams writing up favorable new legislation—everyone working to achieve more for their specific corporation, which has no particular interest in the general needs of the community that you live in.

So the question is, “Why don’t we apply the lessons that we learn from inside our companies—lessons of teamwork and cooperation—to our communities?

And of course, the more difficult question that inevitably follows is, “If city council meetings are taking place and decisions are being made during the standard business hours of 9 to 5, while we’re off at work, spending all of our energies somewhere else, how can we?

September 25, 2005

A New Generation of Toys

I went to the toy store the other day, looking for a board game like Scrabble or Taboo, when I somehow got lost and ended up in the Legos Section. But these weren't the Legos I remember growing up with. Most of them were special movie Legos spinoff packages. Harry Potter. Spider-Man. Star Wars.

There was a section for making a Legos "world city" but most of the boxes had pictures of tanks or F-16's or highway patrol and undercover police vans on the boxes.

And that's when I realized, toys aren't just toys. They're cultural communicators. Paradigm creators. Societal indoctrinators. Toys have the culture and the values of the society embedded within them, almost everywhere you look.

Video Games are obvious, with their never-ending war and militarization message, but think about some of the other games and toys out there.

Monopoly, where the goal is to buy up as much property as possible and gouge everyone else around you with the highest prices until they are bankrupt and you "win".

Life, where the goal is to make it to the end of the game with as much money as possible, and where kids are considered an economic "drain" most of the time, but at the end of the game are thought of as a clever "investment", for which you are rewarded monetarily. Every spin of the wheel it seems leads back to thoughts of money. You land on a space where it says your Uncle's House just got destroyed by a Tornado and the first thing you think of is, "How much is that gonna cost?"

Then there's Barbie and Ken sitting in a corvette, with a sticker on the box near Ken's face saying, "Hey, you wanna go for a ride?" And the sticker near Barbie's face saying, "Only if I get to drive."

O.K. So maybe that's a symbol of female empowerment.

But what about Barbie and Ken taking the train? Or riding a bike? Or driving a hybrid? Or a hydrogen-cell vehicle?

Why doesn't Barbie have a solar-heated spa or a solar powered mansion?
Or a nice little windmill in front of the house?

When I asked a store clerk these questions, he said kids probably wouldn't get it. But the fact is, kids are extremely adaptable and highly intelligent. They're only as intelligent as you encourage them to be. The fact is there are six and seven and eight year olds out there that know how to do more with the computer than I do.

The fact is, Barbie may come in a variety of colors these days with all new accessories, but she's still thinking the same old thoughts, living the life of a doll, surrounded by cute little games that don't really encourage thinking, but rather doodling, whittling away the time, getting dressed up and doing her hair, painting her nails, trying on clothes, waiting for Ken to come pick her up so that they can go cruising, driving around in circles until they get tired or maybe just bored and decide to come home, take off their clothes, get into bed, roll around under the sheets for a while and eventually just stare, wide-eyed, up at the ceiling, wondering why every day feels exactly the same, and so unfulfilling.

About September 2005

This page contains all entries posted to CivilizedNation.com Blog in September 2005. They are listed from oldest to newest.

October 2005 is the next archive.

Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.

Powered by
Movable Type 3.33